This blog contains MPC's response to what happens in our society. They could be stray thoughts, arguments, responses or just musings.
Monday, January 29, 2007
Selective Amnesia in History
Thursday, January 11, 2007
Sorry, Your Lordships !!!
Admission to professional colleges in Kerala and all the protection of social justice will be back to square one in 2007, thanks to the most recent order of the Hon. High Court of Kerala striking down all important clauses of Act 19 of 2006, leaving behind a skeleton of the original Act. This act was intended not only to bring about some amount of social justice in an environment of commercialization and exploitation but to make everyone accountable by following a transparent procedure. One is baffled by the
Private professional colleges collect Capitation Fee (banned by many earlier orders of the Court) from every student. Managements usually do not call for applications through public notice, never specify a last date for application, do not maintain application registers, never prepare any rank list before admission because they simply do not need it. A person desirous of admission approaches the management (Principals are usually kept as scarecrows in the whole affair), bargains wherever possible, pays the capitation fee or donation or whatever else you may call it and secures an application form. Entrance test or no test, the candidate is assured of a seat in the specified branch. In Medical Colleges this amount runs to many lakhs while in Engineering the amount is lower, and depends on the branch, Electronics and Communication quoting the highest. Thus there will be exactly as many applicants as there are seats. They might even conduct an entrance test, but how does it matter if everyone passes? Unless he/she pays the capitation fee a meritorious candidate has no way of collecting an application form and getting enlisted as an applicant. There will be no evidence to show that his merit has been by-passed by money. In fact it was this "unfettered right” that the Act had curtailed and the Hon. Court order has now handed back to managements by dismantling the single window system. Who doesn’t know that their “management entrance test” is the biggest joke played on the public?
Hon. High Court has made an observation that private colleges give quality education that government colleges fail to do. Sorry Your Lordships, the facts tell a different story. Students and parents think that the government, Aided and Govt. Self financing colleges give them a better deal as testified by the rush of high rank holders to these colleges
Table below: 2005 Admission: Highest preferred colleges and the last rank of students admitted to Electronics and Communications Branch (First Round)
College, (Last rank in ECE Branch), Type
1.
2. Model Engg. College, Thrikkakkara (518) Govt. SF
3.
4. Govt.College of Engg. Trissur (697) Govt
5. M A College, Kothamangalam (787) Aided
6. RIT Kottayam (1505) Govt
7. Sree Chithra Trivandrum (1602) Govt. SF
8.
9.
10.
11. Rajagiri School of Engg & Tech., Ekm (2001) Private SF
12. Govt. Engg. College, Sreekrishnapuram, Palakkad (2357) Govt.
13 Govt. College of Engg. Kannur (2500) Govt.
14.
15. Institute of Technology for Women TVM (3191) Govt. SF
16.
17. LBS
18. Adi Sankara Inst. of Engg., EKM (4625) Private SF
19.
In this list of 19 Engineering colleges which obviously were considered as top preference institutions, there are only Two Private Self-financing colleges. Somehow our lawyers failed to convince the court that Private self financing colleges do not enjoy the same credibility as the Government sector.
Any amount of data is available to prove that the entry of self financing colleges has caused a drop in the overall standards mainly due to the admission of undeserving candidates through money power. Although the total number of seats has increased many times the output of engineers in the state has increased only marginally, thanks to the enormous number of dropouts (35%) who would never complete their education. This wastage is mainly from the self financing sector.
Luckily Hon. High Court has not struck down the right of Government to maintain academic standards. The previous government, for reasons unknown to academics had reduced the minimum marks for entry (2006) from 50% to a mere pass in Plus Two. This, together with the “unfettered rights” of managements has brought in all kinds of young people to professional colleges. One need not wait until 2010 to know its consequences. Results of first year exams in various Universities will speak out eloquently.
Government is apparently contemplating an appeal in the Supreme Court. From the earlier verdicts it is clear that this would be a losing battle. Instead, a comprehensive law to be implemented in 2008 should be thought of. Meanwhile looking at the left over clauses of the Act the Government should immediately tighten up the academic requirements and ensure some amount of justice to aspiring candidates by doing the following:
- Ensure that all aspiring students are able to buy the application form and get enlisted as a candidate without paying capitation fee or any part thereof.
- All eligible applicants should be permitted to appear for the “Management Entrance Exam” and obtain a rank
- Valuation of papers should be done without the influence of managements
- A list of successful candidates should be published in the order of ranking.
Managements should be asked to publish the fee structure; any other underhand collection should be treated as a criminal offence. Whatever remains of the Act itself enables the Government to ensure this much.
Tuesday, August 08, 2006
Brute Majority of Minorities in Kerala
(An abridged version of this blog appeared in the New Indian Express, Kochi, on August 12, 2006. The portions deleted by the editors are shown in red colour)
Indian Institute of Science,
It was neither an accident of history nor any political compulsion that prompted the founding fathers of our Constitution to make (made) adequate provision to safeguard the rights of minorities. They did it consciously and deliberately to protect the unity and integrity of this secular nation. It is possible that they were guided by two historical reasons: Firstly they were under the illusion that the nation of their dreams with equality and social justice would be born on the day of independence. Secondly, it was a conscious effort to avoid in independent
In the course of defining “minorities” a hypothetical “majority” came into being by default, like an arithmetic residue. This fictitious majority consists of a multitude of disjoint communities holding infinite number of religious beliefs and practices, speaking languages and dialects unknown to one another and distributed over the entire subcontinent from the
If a few Dalit citizens decide to uplift their community by starting an engineering or medical college they are thoroughly mistaken. That is the fate of Nambuthiris, Nairs and Ezhavas also. None of them are minorities; they all belong to what is known as the “majority community”. Muslims and Christians are the two powerful minority communities of Kerala. Only their colleges and establishments enjoy the constitutional right and special privileges. Constitution dictates they need more protection than Dalits.
In Kerala the so called Christian minorities have, traditionally been more advanced than any Hindu community in education, economic power and social stature. Muslims, despite their backwardness in education are far ahead in trade, industry and consequent financial power. The unity, diligence, wealth and clout of these minorities are reflected by the enormous number of self financing professional institutions they have sponsored. Thirty six out of forty nine engineering colleges and six out of nine medical colleges in the self financing (private) sector are owned by individuals or groups belonging to these communities. Many among the rest of the colleges are run by secular organizations like banks, while one or two are owned by the “majority community” (This euphemism in Orwellian Newspeak refers to any small faction- an obscure caste or tribe- of Hindus).
The Government of Kerala introduced the new Act on self financing colleges to bring about a social control on the managements who have been exploiting students extorting money in the form of Capitation fee. While the managements swear by Supreme Court judgments on minority rights they shamelessly gloss over the order that has banned Capitation fee in any form. The easiest way to continue their exploitation is to hide behind the “minority rights”, and go scot-free under the safety and protection of Law. In Tamil Nadu there was an interesting instance of a Hindu Gounder converting to Christianity (Hail Jesus!!), changing his name from Palani to Devasahayam to get minority status for his college. He really got it, and made mountains of money. In those days a popular pun on minority was “moneyority” in Shatri Bhawan,
The brute majority of minorities and their unfettered right to extort are closely linked to the “vote bank politics” of Kerala. Religious leadership has always supported and safeguarded the interests of the wealthy in the name of religion. The secular parties, in their eagerness to placate religious leaders flout all secular values and assist minority pressure groups to occupy higher echelons of secular establishments. Minority politics and vote bank politics work exactly like the organized sector dictating terms to the vast numbers of disorganized ordinary people. The disorganized “majority community” has no option but to succumb to the blackmail of the well organized capitalists working under the cover of special privileges and enjoying the patronage of religious leaders and political parties. The residual population or the “majority community” need not hope for anything better. The days are not far when they are reduced to tourist attractions like the American Indians.
Monday, August 07, 2006
Dialogue: Jayanth MPC
>>Why is the media here so negative?(Media has a watchdog role.Watchdogs bark when a thief enters the house, not otherwise.They are in fact doing a constructive role)
In Singapore you don't say anything, DO YOU? YOU wouldn't dare to eat in public during Ramadan, in Dubai. YOU would not dare to go out without your head covered in Jeddah. YOU would not dare to buy an employee of the telephone exchange in London at 10 pounds (Rs.650) a month to, 'see to it that my STD and ISD calls are billed to someone else.'YOU would not dare to speed beyond 55 mph (88km/h) in Washington and then tell the traffic cop, 'Jaanta hai main kaun hoon (Do you know who I am?). I am so and so's son.Take your two bucks and get lost.' YOU wouldn't chuck an empty coconut shell anywhere other than the garbage pail on the beaches in Australia and New Zealand.
Why don't YOU spit Paan on the streets of Tokyo? Why don't YOU use examination jockeys or buy fake certificates in Boston??? We are stilltalking of the same YOU. YOU who can respect and conform to a foreign system in other countries but cannot in your own. You who will throw papers and cigarettes on the road the moment you touch Indian ground. If you can be an involved and appreciative citizen in an alien country, why cannot you be the same here in India?
>>In America every dog owner has to clean up after his pet has done the job.Same in Japan. Wil l the Indian citizen do that here?' He's right. We go to the polls to choose a government and after that forfeit all responsibility.
Dear Jayanth,
I do not know how to agree or disagree with a set of self-contradictory realities. I can cetrainly tell you that you are barking up the wrong tree when you blame India's spirituality for all evils. Have you thought about the sustainability of "Development" at local and global levels? Have you thought about the relation between sustainability and speed of "Development" ? If the rich countries in the world (Singapore is after all a parody to the word 'country') sustain their riches it is because poor countries take all the garbage. That is true with the rich men in Bobmbay too. Their drainage seeps into wells of the poor and the effluents of their automobiles are inhaled by the poor. Sustainable local development is posible only by listening to the rishis who lived in harmony with Nature and valued the right of all living creatures to share this planet (You are wrong if you think rishis slept in stinking toilets. In fact we, the so-called developed people suffer the stink of toilets)
In fact I am disappointed by the President's address if it is to all Indian people. He means to correct only the microscopic minority of the rich and educated. He should be kidding if he was addressing the slum dwellers of Mumbai and Chennai who couldn't care less on where to throw the cigarette butts in order to make their city look like Singapore, because they themselves are eking out a living on the garbage they live in.
Our perception on the Indian People should change. Who are they? The slum dwellers? The villagers who do not use even half a unit of electrical energy? Or just the IT professionals who make cheap labour for American Express bank? This last lot should in fact worry about their cigrette butts. They can also be a little more patriotic and start drinking Kingfisher Beer instead of Heinikan Beer.
MPC
Jayanth Continues..
Sunday, August 06, 2006
A Prayer to Lord Ayyappa
JAYANTH
AP Jayanthram wrote